3 min readBengaluruUpdated: Jul 27, 2026 04:04 PM IST
Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla urged the government and the Opposition to reach a consensus by 5 pm so that the House can take up for discussion the stringent law against exam paper leaks introduced in the House Monday. Birla made this announcement soon after the House reassembled at 2 pm but could not function amid sloganeering by the Opposition members over police action against students during protests over NEET paper leak last week.
Earlier in the day, Union Minister of State for the Department of Personnel and Training Dr Jitendra Singh introduced the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026.
Birla announced that the House will take up the Bill, which, he said, is an extremely important piece of legislation related to the future, aspirations and hard work of crores of youths of the country.
“This Bill is very important to safeguard the interests of crores of youths by providing provisions to effectively check crimes like paper leaks and stringent penal provisions to punish culprits,” Birla said.
Over 90 amendments submitted
Underlining the need for a debate, the Speaker said that members had submitted 91 amendment notices, signalling significant interest across party lines to deliberate on the clauses.
“In a democracy, the expression of views by all is the core strength of the system,” Birla told the House. “Sloganeering and displaying placards is not the way to express views. I have allocated six hours for discussion, and if members wish to speak further, I will request the House to extend the time.”
Birla urged Opposition members to return to their seats and participate in the debate before adjourning proceedings until 5 pm to allow leaders to find common ground.
Story continues below this ad
Concurring with the Speaker, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju questioned the rationale behind the Opposition’s protests despite filing multiple amendment notices.
“On the one hand, many amendment notices have been submitted, and the Speaker has agreed to grant sufficient time for debate; why then raise slogans?” Rijiju asked.
Saying that the nation’s youth were closely watching parliamentary proceedings, the minister added, “Preventing a debate on a crucial measure like the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill sends a very wrong message. I urge the Congress party to explain this to its colleagues and initiate the discussion. We agree whatever time the Speaker decides.”