Rep. Tom Emmer: New GOA report shows there’s ‘a lot of work to do’ battling fraud in America
Sandra Smith and John Roberts examine the 2025 Improper Payments Report, which reveals $186 billion in government overpayments, increasing $24 billion from the prior year. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) highlights that over $3 trillion has been lost since 2003 due to fraud. He stresses the need for stronger oversight and updated systems to protect taxpayer dollars from being exploited.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
I’m a flat tax guy like Steve Forbes, chairman and editor-in-chief, Forbes Media and author of “Flat Tax Revolution,” so in an ideal world, we wouldn’t stuff the IRS tax code with special tax breaks and instead would have one simple, low rate of 18% for everyone.
But if Congress passes tax laws steering people and businesses into certain activities, it can’t just snatch those incentives away indiscriminately. This is called a “bait-and-switch” trap, and here’s a perfect example of such a misdeed.
More than 60 years ago, the IRS created a program called a conservation easement through a revenue ruling. Its goal was to protect nature, stop development, and save working lands. Landowners received a tax incentive for voluntarily setting aside a portion of their land from development. The law has been in effect since 1976 — nearly 50 years. The tax break was made permanent in 1980 and has been part of the tax code ever since.
To further encourage this land preservation policy, individuals, business partnerships and corporations were permitted to donate to these land easements in exchange for a tax write-off. The result? Tens of millions of acres have been conserved.
IRS RAISES BUSINESS MILEAGE DEDUCTION RATE AMID FUEL PRICE SURGE
Then, in late 2016, IRS officials who disapproved of these syndicated conservation-easement transactions unilaterally changed the rules of the game. Notice 2017-10 did not formally abolish the conservation-easement deduction, but it branded a broad category of transactions as “listed transactions,” imposed burdensome disclosure requirements, and opened the door to an aggressive campaign challenging taxpayers who used them.
If there are bad actors, of course, they should be punished, but the vast majority of these tax deals were created legally.
They retroactively labeled partnerships participating in the program “presumptively abusive.” This aggressive IRS enforcement campaign has swept more than 1,100 syndicated conservation-easement disputes into audits and litigation, including roughly 740 cases docketed in U.S. Tax Court and about 400 transactions still under examination as of May 2026.
The IRS improperly issued Notice 2017-10, branding an entire category of these legal, decades-old transactions presumptively abusive, retroactive to 2010.
No proposed rule. No public comment. No vote by anyone accountable to voters.
Just an IRS notice — followed by an increase to a 100% audit rate for all transactions of this kind. The result was an abusive enforcement campaign that has now clogged the U.S. Tax Court with more than a thousand cases.
TENS OF MILLIONS OF TAXPAYERS MAY BE OWED IRS REFUNDS FROM COVID-ERA
If there are bad actors, of course, they should be punished. A bipartisan Senate Finance Committee investigation identified serious abuses in some syndicated conservation-easement transactions, particularly deals involving inflated land valuations and outsized deductions. But evidence that some promoters abused the deduction does not give the IRS license to presume that every transaction was fraudulent or that every investor knowingly participated in a tax shelter.
By using cookie-cutter metrics and conducting desk audits, the IRS has harassed law-abiding taxpayers, pressured them to pay tens of millions of dollars in unfair “settlement agreements,” forced some to file for bankruptcy, and treated them like common criminals despite their having followed the law.
A sign for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is seen outside its building on February 13, 2025, in Washington, D.C. The IRS does not make the laws. Congress does. (Photo by Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)
Clearly, the IRS changed tax law after the fact, which is only legal “with respect to criminal and penal cases, but not civil revenue measures.” On top of that, the IRS does not make the laws. Congress does. Sadly, the IRS continued this aggressive approach during the Biden administration, when the agency received a major infusion of funding and personnel that expanded its enforcement capacity. Rather than correcting the campaign’s procedural and fairness problems, the administration allowed it to continue against taxpayers caught in these long-running conservation-easement disputes.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
Perhaps the most ironic part is that the IRS itself was caught engaging in illegal activity. In a May 2026 report, the Treasury Inspector General found seven cases involving backdated penalty-approval documents; the IRS conceded more than $68 million in penalties in those cases.
Even so, IRS officials have frightening leeway to make allegations of tax fraud, then serve as judge, jury, and executioner, forcing people to pay tax bills that aren’t actually owed. It is a pattern of abuse that Americans have come to recognize: an agency substituting its own policy preferences for the law Congress wrote, then using its enforcement powers to punish law-abiding citizens who relied on the statute as written.
It’s time for Congress to amend tax laws to prohibit after-the-fact tax changes so that trust and fairness in the tax code can be restored.
In addition, the IRS should issue clear guidance on how to make a proper donation of a conservation easement and how to prudently value the deduction without creating later controversy.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Finally, the IRS should immediately end the witch hunt against law-abiding taxpayers who were encouraged by Congress and the Treasury Department for decades to participate in conservation easement programs.
Simply put, this is weaponization at its worst — and it is un-American.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE MOORE