The IPMA, in a statement on Wednesday, said that the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) has already established dumping and recommended remedial duties, while calling for immediate roll-out of anti-dumping duties on Virgin Multi-Layer Paperboard from Indonesia.
“The urgency has increased with the Minimum Import Price (MIP), imposed as an interim measure against low-priced imports, set to expire on September 30, 2026,” the IPMA said.
Read More: ITC’s Sanjiv Puri says CPP acquisition marks ‘defining milestone’ for paper business
The association has said that the MIP cannot substitute for the definitive trade-remedial measure recommended following a detailed investigation by DGTR.
In a representation to the Union Finance Minister, the IPMA pointed out that India’s Virgin Paperboard Industry suffered material injury estimated at Rs 242 crore in FY2024-25 alone due to indiscriminate dumping by Indonesian manufacturers.
“The investigation has been completed after a detailed, transparent and quasi-judicial process and the injury to the domestic industry has been clearly established. With the DGTR having recommended Anti-Dumping Duty, there is an urgent need to translate the recommendation into remedial action. Every further delay means continued injury to domestic manufacturers,” said Pawan Agarwal, President, IPMA.According to the IPMA, following its investigation covering April 2024 to March 2025, DGTR recommended imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty on the dumped imports from Indonesia through its notification dated June 25, 2026.
Read More: ADB approves USD 42.2 mln loan to boost bamboo industry in northeast region
DGTR found that the domestic industry had suffered material deterioration, incurred financial losses and recorded negative return on capital employed following the sharp increase in imports.
The IPMA stated that imports of Virgin Multi-Layer Paperboard from Indonesia surged from a negligible 296 tonnes in FY2021-22 to 62,935 tonnes in FY2024-25. At the same time, CIF import prices declined by 25 per cent. DGTR found that these imports were priced materially below the selling price and even the cost of sales of the Indian industry, forcing domestic manufacturers to reduce prices and sell at losses to compete.