Yes Securities said the agreements, combined with PLI schemes and “China+1” diversification, give India its clearest shot yet at achieving US$1 trillion in merchandise exports by 2030.
“India’s recent wave of FTAs marks a fundamental shift in economic strategy from cautious protectionism toward deeper global trade integration,” Yes Securities said in its report.
The report said FTAs are no longer just about tariffs.
“These FTAs are not merely trade agreements but represent the foundation of a multi-year industrial and export-led growth cycle,” Yes Securities noted.
Agreements with the UAE, Australia, UK, EFTA, Oman, New Zealand and the EU are being implemented alongside industrial corridors, port upgrades and supply-chain localization. That mix, the brokerage said, makes India one of the few economies with the scale, labour force and domestic market size to absorb large manufacturing relocation.
The biggest transmission mechanism may be investment. “One of the strongest arguments in favor of FTAs is their potential ability to revive India’s stagnant private investment cycle,” Yes Securities said. With capacity utilization around 75%, companies lack confidence for large capex. Exports through FTAs can provide sustained demand, improve utilization and economies of scale, and eventually trigger stronger private-sector investment, mirroring the East Asian path where exports catalyzed manufacturing expansion and capital formation. Services are expected to remain a parallel engine. India is targeting US$2 trillion in total exports by 2030, split evenly between merchandise and services. Yes Securities said UK and EU agreements improve access for IT services, consulting, engineering R&D and financial services, reinforcing India’s edge in skilled labour and technology.
But the brokerage cautioned that market access alone is not enough. “The strongest counterargument is that India’s primary challenge lies not in market access but in domestic competitiveness,” it said.
Merchandise exports grew at just 3.5% CAGR over 2015-2025. Structural bottlenecks like high logistics costs, expensive power, compliance complexity and lower labour productivity remain. Without fixing these, FTAs could widen trade deficits if imports rise faster than exports.